SkateZilla

This is fixed internally, once the latest build passes some testing phases and I remove some things that aren't released, then the public will have a new build.

From the chart's I've seen for steam, since the price hike, no one is willing to spend $15 on F4 just to play BMS, they go to other sources that still have the entire collection for less than $10, or purchase a physical copy for a few bucks from a bargain bin supplier ( ie: Dollar General etc etc) as their "Proof of Purchase".

MP hasn't done much except hype up and live off the Copyrights for old MP projects they had zilch to do with, and when that revenue pool started shrinking, they increased the prices. $15 for Falcon 4.0 now is absurd, you can buy a F4 CD brand spankin' new at dollar general for $2, and they know the only reason it is still selling is because of BMS's requirement of having it. I paid $3.99 for the entire Falcon Collection, just so I wouldn't have to retain a DVD Drive in my rig anymore. F5 or any completely new sim of the 2020+ era is likely not even in active development, they are already way behind on their other projects, outside of bar napkin notes, there is likely no F5 work being done.

I have a Model of the Pylon, however Fuel tanks cannot have 2 element attachments, so I cannot place it like I would a Missile using a Launcher. I'd rather replace the entire external for A/B and F

The Pylon is integrated into the F-5E Model, I cannot move it. The only way would be to replace the model w/ a new one that I can edit. I have other projects that are higher priority at the moment, plus I still have to do a separate version of everything for the F-5E Remastered Version, as the model is not the same and Items don't line up correctly.

DCS_Updater.exe repair

I don't think everyone understands the power the latest gen and even last gen cell phones have in terms of sensors.

I know guys that use their I-Phones and get killer results.

South Atlantic was "Published" by RazBAM, but the Development was by a separate team from RB. With "Specifics" unknown, You can assume, the team didn't want to make a new name and LLC, so they chose RB to be their Publisher, since the map was to mainly utilize their AV-8B. Whether accurate or not, I dunno So that being said, RB right now is on pause as a developer. the Map like the numerous Campaigns that utilize the AV-8B, M-2000C, or South Atlantic etc, don't really have anything to do with RB's Development Contract, License, Mojo, PB and J etc etc etc.

There's already a Drone Station platform trainer made by ED for the Pro market.

Still have to train the human drone pilots.

IFEI Switches to Green to be NVG Compliant.

No, because: A. It is based off the Legacy Hornet, which is ED's IP. B. The 3D External Model is licensed and not fully owned IP. C. I'm not paying for commercial/consumer distribution software license. Whichever Boeing requires, if not both. D. if A B and C weren't enough, I have cat gifs. *(Sorry Running Trend on our discord)*

Most of the IDF Team resides in a part of the world that's in a not so good place right now.

Problem is, the A-10s are all Old, despite getting new wings, which were already made and sitting in a warehouse when FC shut down operations, the main fuselage still endures stress from the GAU/8. FC is gone, so is the tooling to build more, the only reason the A-10 is still in service, is because A. there is nothing close to doing that specific job on the same level. B. It would cost more to retire it than to operate it, C. Changes in congress at key times caused indecisions in the USAF Budget. So I can emphasize each point a little bit: A. It's obvious, there is no other platform with a GAU/8, they tried to mount one on a F-16, it didn't work out that well. The F-35A, being it's replacement, only because it's multi-role. But the Battlefield in the east, is not the type of battlefield where you can sit at 25K and lob LBGs and GPS Munitions all day, sometimes you gotta get down low and dirty, and I do not see the USAF sending a costly aircraft that has next to no AA Protection down low w/ only 180 rounds of GAU/22, it's like shooting NERK darts at a speeding car, not gonna do very much against armour. But the Airforce is consolidating, they don't want one aircraft specializing in one role, they want one aircraft that's OK at many, good at a few, to replace multiple, the Navy did the same thing, at one point it was the United States Department of Super Hornets, F-14s, A-7s, A-6s, S-3s, all gone off the deck, replaced by the F/A-18E/F/Gs. Shoot, if they could strap a trailer to the plane, it'd be replacing their COD as well. B. Retiring the A-10, Sending it to mothballs, training and re-assignment of personnel and delegating Airwing roles to another aircraft to train on, would cost more than simple keeping the A-10s in service in a reduced flight hour status. C. Every time the A-10 retirement is on the docket to be voted on, leadership and priorities change, and it gets dropped off the agenda. Make no mistake, the days are numbered, as each older airframe even w/ the new wings approaches the flight hour limits, they are being retired one after another, and w/ the fleet getting smaller, the remaining airframes are getting exponentially higher flight time, so their journey to their service life limit is hastened w/ every airframe they retire.

https://discord.gg/vZrJCA2euy

The A->C Shape is extremely different, Wing Root, Wings, Flaps, Flaperons, Leading Edge, Trailing Edge, Horizontal Stabs, Vertical Stabs, Part of the Lower Fuselage, Entire Landing Gear System, Aft Fuselage, Hook Compartment, Upper Fuselage/Nose Area, AAR System, etc. Although the A->C Avionics would be easy, the Flight Model would need to be a separate project. The B is a different animal altogether, as there are systems in the B's avionics not present in the A or C.

https://discord.gg/J7NRsnm6

This issue is related to the ModernMPD Mod.

no, pylon restrictions are hardcoded in the PFM/Systems DLL.

and the F-302.. Ooops.

Apologies, I have been working on a Mod Project, but at present it's at a slow pace as other things have taken priority, I was posting regular updates in my Wingtip Tanks Mod thread, As the mod originated from that, The New Mod when finished would be Titled: "F-5E Expansion", Previous Discussions: Mod Thread w/ other updates:

DCS Updater Utility v 03.29.2025 / 2.0.0.42 Change Log:

If we can re-produce this on the Legacy hornet, then it's a Legacy hornet bug, with the avionics and not changes to the super hornet.

I would need to see a screenshot of the command prompt box.